Letter to my stalker comment spammer – ghfhfjhj

Dear ghfhfjhj

I’m pretty sure that’s not your real name, but as your IP address is either 61.152.188.143 or 222.73.218.233 and your email address ghfhfjhj@gmail.com are the only thing that do not change from comment to comment (aside from your somewhat repetitive phrases), it seems this is the only name I have for you.  Perhaps, for simplicity’s sake I’ll just call you “G” as I’m not sure I’ll get the pronunciation of ghfhfjhj right!

Tin of Turkey SpamNow G, I just wanted to write you a little letter as I’m a wee bit concerned; I’m getting the impression that there’s something a little bit off with you and that perhaps your comments are not as sincere as you’d have me believe. Now I know your grasp of the written English language is lacking, to say the least, but I’m assuming that you either didn’t have much of a formal education or that perhaps English is not your first language.  However, there really is no excuse for not getting your comments right when you use very basic, short phrases that you repeat with alarming frequency.  Surely you have had enough time to practice getting them right by now?  I mean seriously G, how hard would it be to change:

“Excuse for that I interfere ?I understand this question. It is possible to discuss.”

to:

“Excuse my interference, but I understand your question and wonder if it would be possible to discuss it with you?”

Perhaps I’m being too harsh, perhaps the worlds of pandora jewellery and replica swiss watches are far more complicated than my little mind could imagine and therefore in the cut and thrust of fake watches and pandora beads there just isn’t time to learn the basics of English?  Your fingers are in other pies too, such as abercrombie and fitch hoodies, but primarily it’s the beads and watches websites that you seem to comment from on my Sky Dancing article.

And that brings me on to one of my primary concerns about you G.  I mean what is it about the article Sky Dancing that has led you to leave more than one hundred comments on it?  I mean one or two are flattering, but over a hundred is just freaky, you left 22 in just two days.  The number of comments is even more perplexing when you consider that Sky Dancing is such a short post and mainly a poem and picture.  There’s no big debate, so why the constant messages to “..Let’s discuss it. Write to me in PM, we will talk.” I’m assuming you mean write to you in a private message rather than writing you in the pm rather than am; as being unsure of your location I couldn’t be accurate as to what your time zone is and indeed whether you meant your pm or mine.  It just gets too confusing all round!

Now I’m sorry G, but I have to ask….Do you have a split personality?  ’Cause you can’t seem to make up your mind what you think about Sky Dancing.  today at 12.50 pm I was and I quote “The authoritative message, is tempting…”, (BTW kudos on spelling authoritative right!), but at 11.06 am you were telling me to “Be not deceived in this respect.”, (Gone all Shakespearean like on me now huh?), quite what you think I might be deceived about is beyond me, but that’s another topic and I digress.  At 8.22 am this morning you were all for flattering me “Bravo, this brilliant phrase is necessary just by the way” – I have to ask, which phrase, you never say and you’ve put that comment at least 10 times!  However you are not universally flattering in your comments, in fact you’re downright contradictory and confrontational, for example at 5.56 am today (boy you start early!) you told me “In my opinion you are mistaken. Write to me in PM, we will talk.” Again, you never tell me how I’m mistaken and you’ve added that comment a fair few times too!  Well I ask you G, if you were the one receiving these kinds of mixed messages on a regular basis from someone you’d never met would you want to send them a private message?……your silence speaks volumes!

Are you perhaps related to hfjsdfh, whose email address is hfjsdfh@gmail.com, IP address 222.73.218.225, let’s call him “H”.  H is big into the tattoo market and is often commenting “Excuse for that I interefere ?But this theme is very close to me. Is ready to help.” amongst other nonsensical and irrelevant phrases.  To be frank G, I don’t think I really need the help, but don’t tell H, I wouldn’t want to hurt his feelings.

Anyway G, I just wanted to check that you were “okay” and to let you know that I don’t think this relationship is going to grow into the kind that has me “pm’ing” you (in the am or pm) on a regular basis, in fact if I’m honest I’m not ever going to pm you.  I wouldn’t want to string you along, that just isn’t my style, best to feel the pain now before you become too attached to the idea of a pm relationship with me.  Should you continue to comment on Sky Dancing (I have little doubt of this not being the case), then your comments alas will always fall into my spam filter, where I will giggle, shake my head and wonder at the mind behind them for a second or two, before permanently deleting them.  I wish you luck with your beads, watches and hoodies, but to be honest I’m not into beads, I don’t wear a watch and abercrombie and fitch just isn’t my style, so won’t be checking out your no doubt mal/spyware laced websites, with the occasional virus gem.

Best wishes and good luck with the spamming!

Wealie x


Some other funny Blog posts you might like

I’ll add to this list as I find blog posts that tickle me and hopefully tickle you too!

  • A humorous day in the life of  a new blogger a guest post by Steve Taite on How to make my blog.com
  • This entry was posted in My Blog and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

    One Response to Letter to my stalker comment spammer – ghfhfjhj

    1. wealie on December 19, 2010 at 10:18 pm

      Update:

      Since posting this article G has been very active on my Sky Dancing article posting the following five new spam comments:

      As hermes (selling watches of course) “It is good when so!” – Eh?

      As pandora earrings – “Willingly I accept. In my opinion, it is an interesting question, I will take part in discussion. Together we can come to a right answer.” – I didn’t actually pose a question in the article, but hey.

      As hermes again “I apologise, but, in my opinion, there is other way of the decision of a question” – Again Eh?

      As bell ross watches “what amusing question” – Whatever!

      and finally as patek philippe (sounds like my non-English theory might have weight) “You have hit the mark. In it something is also idea good, agree with you.”

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>